And thank you for losing your own argument under Godwin's Law.

If what Israel did to the Palestinian Arabs or the Lebanese had the same causes as the actions of, was anywhere near as bad as or had anything resembling the goals of the Nazis, maybe you'd have a point.  Unfortunately for your point, none of those three points is so.

p.s: I think you should check the definition of "completely unschathed" and compare it to the fact that lebanon still doesn't have any power after you guys destroyed their entire civilian infrastructure as a disproportionate reaction to the capture of two soldiers who had encraoched into lebanese territory in the first place.   cheers.

Quote (Gal Dukat @ Nov. 25 2006, 11:55 am)

And thank you for losing your own argument under Godwin's Law.

godwins law (?)
(is that the one that says 'the first person to mention "nazis" in an innanet arguement always loses')(?)


ROFL!

I'm not talking about the Lebanese people when I say "completely unscathed," I'm talking about Hezbollah.  Were some Lebanese civilians killed?  Yes.  Were they the intended targets of the IDF attacks?  No.  Can the same be said the other way around regarding the organization that the UN has done nothing to stop rearming?  Sadly, no.

Quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict The conflict began when Hezbollah fired Katyusha rockets and mortars at Israeli military positions and border villages to divert attention from another Hezbollah unit that crossed the border and kidnapped two Israeli soldiers (Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev) and killed three. Israel attempted to rescue the abducted soldiers and five more were killed during the rescue mission.

"Cheers."

POINT : the problem with organized religion..   is organized religion.  

As you're trying to point out yourself, it's only the extremists who say that X religion is the only way and everybody else must be eliminated.  None of whom, mind you, are in power right now, or ever have been in power in Israel.

Now, please, because I forgot to ask earlier, point out to me where I've said that because of what the Nazis did, that justifies anything you believe Israel is doing wrong.

Quote (Gal Dukat @ Nov. 25 2006, 12:27 pm)

And if the sitting government in Israel or any of the governments Israel has ever had actually actively endorsed Judaism as the only way and went as extreme as the Jesuits or the Islamic terrorists of today, you might have a point.  But, as you're trying to point out yourself, it's only the extremists who say that.  None of whom, mind you, are in power right now, or ever have been in power in Israel. Now, please, because I forgot to ask earlier, point out to me where I've said that because of what the Nazis did, that justifies anything you believe Israel is doing wrong.

at this point you're going to have to watch the JFk video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....ossfire

-======-
and while you're at it watch these too.  

one for a bunch of quotes from OTHER world leaders (not just kennedy) dating back about 200 years who all say the same thing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....ossfire

and the other two for a brief history of cabalism, the freemasons, and the knights templar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....search=

-========-

as for your question you said something about "condemning Israel for something that other nations or organizations are doing ten times worse," and I just applied it to history.  
you seem to be saying, if somebody does something incredibly evil to you, then you can turn around and be equally evil in response.  *shrug*

I'm saying that it's anti-Semitism to condemn Israel for something that others are doing ten times worse.  I'm not saying just between Israel and the Arabs.  I'm also saying it's ridiculous when China can get away without being condemned and then Israel is called the worst violator of human rights in the world.

http://interestingtimes.blogspot.com/2006....aw.html