MODS Network

Registered Users: 130,211 Users Online: 7

"A total overhaul mod changes or redefines the gameplay style of the original game, while keeping it in the original game's universe or plot." *

Members Online

0 Active | 7 Guests

Online:

LATEST FORUM THREADS

by ammys09

Posts: 1 / 264

warfare

CoD4 Map + Mod Releases

by devielthan

Posts: 1 / 1777

Key Things the Design Comm...

CoDBO MP Mapping

by rabbihasan21

Posts: 1 / 1099

Three Out of 10 Television...

CoDBO General

by warrior777

Posts: 2 / 899

Voting menu on maps

CoD+UO General

Posts: 0 / 792

Hauling 911

CoDBO3 General

Polls

-- see more --

Forums

Welcome to the MODSonline.com forums. Looking for Frequently Asked Questions? Check out our FAQs section or search it out using the SEARCH link below. If you are new here, you may want to check out our rules and this great user's guide to the forums and the website.
For more mapping and modding information, see our Wiki: MODSonWiki.com

Jump To:

Forum:	All Forums : Call of Duty: World at War
Category:	CoDWW General General game questions, comments, and chat.
Moderators:	foyleman, Foxhound, Mystic, StrYdeR, batistablr, Welshy, DrBiggzz, supersword, playername, novemberdobby

Author

Topic: WW2 I SAY BAH!

vital88

General Member
Since: May 29, 2008
Posts: 25
Last: Jul 9, 2008
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Wednesday, Jul. 9, 2008 09:03 pm
ACS-Biohazard writes... Quote: guys i have windows live messenger and theres no monthly fee so i dont know what u are talking about windowslive messenger is a part of msn messenger I didn't say windows live messenger I said windows live account....same thing Xbox users use.
Share \|

Lee

General Member
Since: Jan 20, 2006
Posts: 136
Last: Feb 10, 2010
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Wednesday, Jul. 9, 2008 10:51 pm
"Windows Live" is free also, not sure what the problem is here. vital88 are you the same guy who posted about there being too many WW2 games? edited on Jul. 9, 2008 06:55 pm by Lee
Share \|

techno2sl

General Member
Since: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 2977
Last: Oct 14, 2010
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Jul. 10, 2008 04:02 pm
Where the game is set shouldnt be the issue, how the game plays, and the quality of the game overall should be how it is judged. Plus any speculation into whether or not its "pay to play", is just speculation, wait for comformation before panic ensues.
Share \|

Gen_Boom

General Member
Since: Apr 24, 2006
Posts: 80
Last: May 5, 2009
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Saturday, Aug. 2, 2008 03:44 am
Ya, dont believe the rumors, wait for official words, because sometimes your expectations may rise higher than what the game will actually offer, or you might panic about something that isnt true... I had that with CoD2 talk... Anyway, I still play UO and I think it is the best of CoD Series when it comes to gameplay... I love the big maps, thats the biggest part of my game... Also I am very happy that Trayarch is making this game and going back to WWII... Theres are already modern shooters and thay are all fictitious whereas the WWII games are historical, which makes them more interesting... I think CoD5 will replace UO with great gameplay (hopefully big maps) and great graphics... :)
Share \|

starkk

General Member
Since: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 216
Last: Apr 5, 2012
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 06:57 pm
vital88 writes... Quote: Well I read what stryder has said. I dont think it will be popular. I heard that you actually have to have a windows live account to play online which is by month, if anyone can get any info on this would be great. I will not get this game if there is a monthly fee. If you look at all the WW2 games today there all mostly dying off rapidly. Also if you look at COD4, Crysis, and many others are still thriving. someones probably said this but windows live = free pc doesnt have to pay a cent like xbox does.
Share \|

dundy

General Member
Since: Dec 14, 2004
Posts: 768
Last: Nov 1, 2020
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 09:28 pm
WW2 RULES sick of getting killed by planes/chopper....sprawnkilling with noobtube bolt rifle all the way WOOOOT most people against it are new players...who havend played cod/uo
Share \|

LuckySoul

General Member
Since: Feb 2, 2008
Posts: 55
Last: Mar 21, 2010
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 11:15 pm
I am not against it, but not exactly welcoming it with open arms. I enjoy modern games and I am not new and have played COD, UO and COD2, COD4. All I can imagine is another version of TDM, DM RNG in a different theater. I can also see mods being made to make the guns more accurate, duh they are WWII era or red dots on the screens. Game looks sweet, but also see the same dumb AI in the game play trailers. Not real sure I will picking this one up.
Share \|

blmeanie

General Member
Since: Mar 13, 2005
Posts: 196
Last: Mar 31, 2009
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 11:29 pm
The don't have to go far to beat EA at the pacific theatre. Pacific assault was never supported and graphically required more from a rig than was standard back then. I have faith that it will be good (read: for a year or so) and then hopefully they will leapfrog to Vietnam which has only been done on a big scale by EA. (appologies to vietcong and Men of valor). I think politics come into play in game making, think Vietnam games have been somewhat suppressed because there are enough people in the world that hated and still hate the war and it can easily be a sore subject. WWII and terrorists - easy targets. Fair to guess all WWII age people are not playing fps games, so only descendants would have objections of making games from it. Everybody hates terrorists except terrorists (now if we could only figure out how to get terrorists to hate other terrorists...i digress). WWII is an easy target. It offers some speed in weapons along with a romanced era. Could/should be good as long as it isn't done by EA.
Share \|

tourist.Tam

General Member
Since: Feb 2, 2007
Posts: 397
Last: Oct 6, 2009
[view latest posts]

Category: CoDWW General Posted: Thursday, Aug. 21, 2008 11:43 pm
blmeanie writes... Quote: The don't have to go far to beat EA at the pacific theatre. Pacific assault was never supported and graphically required more from a rig than was standard back then. I have faith that it will be good (read: for a year or so) and then hopefully they will leapfrog to Vietnam which has only been done on a big scale by EA. (appologies to vietcong and Men of valor). I think politics come into play in game making, think Vietnam games have been somewhat suppressed because there are enough people in the world that hated and still hate the war and it can easily be a sore subject. WWII and terrorists - easy targets. Fair to guess all WWII age people are not playing fps games, so only descendants would have objections of making games from it. Everybody hates terrorists except terrorists (now if we could only figure out how to get terrorists to hate other terrorists...i digress). WWII is an easy target. It offers some speed in weapons along with a romanced era. Could/should be good as long as it isn't done by EA. Korea? Somalia? I am wainting for this release. :)
Share \|