"Those of you who enjoyed the latest Call of Duty’s modern-day approach may be saddened to learn that Treyarch (the dev team responsible for three, and, who will quite possibly end up doing seven) is taking the series back to World War II for the fifth game in the series."

Full Story Here

Oh god not tryarch, they ruined CoD3 why bother having another shot at it.

Doesn't confirm anything.

Although it would be great to see what they could do now, CoD3 was rushed so perhaps they'll have more time with their new baby. Hopefully they use IW technology and quit using their own.

omg. How stupid can Activision be? i mean come on, only like 10,000 people bought CoD3 while nearly 10,000,000 bought CoD2 AND CoD4.

Any one up for sending a petition of some sort?

Rasta writes...


R&R projects would make a better job then tryarch :D

what that lazy dude said

One thing I've never understood is this:
Cod:uo is by far the best COD in the series to date but isnt what you'd say perfect. I remember getting COD2 (as a present so i hadnt read up on it) but when I came to play it it was pretty similar with only a few new features when I was expecting tanks and jeeps and all that malarky.
Why dont they just take the UO model and re-vamp it up, so better vehichle animations and skins etc with the numerous gametypes and nicer range of stock maps?

I don't see why people think CoD:UO is the best of the franchise just because it had vehicles.

Tanks and bigger maps, so what.
The only thing CoD:UO has topped off from the other CoD games is support. They had a lot of Grey Matter/Treyarch people flourish the IWN forums helping people, and still do (incognito).

Although slightly off topic but while we're talking about Treyarch...does anyone notice that community people who get hired slowly stop talking with the community (ChrisP, r0ger, Oraco, etc...)?
I'm pretty sure they don't have NDAs saying they can't post on forums.

maybe its because they get tired of people bashing, hating, and talking crap.

"Oh God, not TreyArch again"

"omg. How stupid can Activision be? i mean come on, only like 10,000 people bought CoD3 while nearly 10,000,000 bought CoD2 AND CoD4. Any one up for sending a petition of some sort?"

why would they WANT to talk to you after that?
yes COD 3 was a rush job, because of scheduling.
COD 4 had 2 YEARS of development, COD 3 had 9 MONTHS.
which do you think would come out the best with that kind of scheduling? do you think IW said "we're gonna take 2 years to make COD 4" and TreyArch said " we only want 9 months for COD 3". are you REALLY that stupid??? if you want to blame somebody, then write your stupid petitions to Activision and tell them YOU WANT the studios to have more time to make a better game.

and this: "R&R Projects could do better than TreyArch"

in your freakin dreams.

if you think its SO easy to do, then put your money where your mouth is and go to the studio and prove yourself.
make your OWN level and your OWN script and your OWN SP or MP gameplay and submit it for review. try doing something ORIGINAL of your OWN instead of claiming everybody else's work as your own because you change one or two things.
just because you can alter a skin or mod somebody else's script, you think you're a mod god?
get real. and get a life. and shut the hell up.

A little too blunt Bloodlust but I agree with you.