ok so, get this:

my sister Emails me the other day and fills my inbox with 9/11 conspiracy evidence.  

in a way I was kinda proud.

except.. she's on about that "where did the plane go" video, that compiles all the pentagon-lawn evidence, and basically says..
"if no plane on the ground, then no plane hit the wall".  to a funky soundtrack.
(you've seen it)

I'm watching this, thinking, yeah.  "welcome to last year". there's a simple reason why they dismiss all pentagon evidence.

and without thinking too much about it I responded with a video that shows an f4 phantom "crash test"' where they shot a US fighter plane into a wall @500MPH just to see what would happen to the wall.

(Q:what happens when an unstoppable force meets an imoveable object?
A: a huge-MO'FO-release of energy like a thousand sticks of dynamite)

boom. the plane was "vaporized".   its actually pretty cool.  watch it for yourself. there's nothing left but aluminum "dust"; the plane itself just dissappears

http://www.stupidvideos.com/video/stunts/plane_crash_test/





so there's me: arguing against the Big Conspiracy™   playing the role of Scully instead of "Mulder"
(sinnners get your ice skates. #### has frozen over)

-==========-

not that this video really proves anything, it just debunks the X-file

Wow I wasn't expecting it to happen like that either. Interesting.

Yeah, I saw that Vid of the plane before, sometimes unexplainable things can be explained.

Quote (SteMot @ Sep. 19 2006, 12:20 pm)

Yeah, I saw that Vid of the plane before, sometimes unexplainable things can be explained.

If it's unexplainable then why was it expalined? =S ?? I don't quite understand.

Wow...

Read the comment beneath that video. It says something like I think they were testing the wall, not the plane  

Quote (The Stalker @ Sep. 19 2006, 11:36 am)

Quote (SteMot @ Sep. 19 2006, 12:20 pm) Yeah, I saw that Vid of the plane before, sometimes unexplainable things can be explained. If it's unexplainable then why was it expalined? =S ?? I don't quite understand. Wow... Read the comment beneath that video. It says something like I think they were testing the wall, not the plane

I meant that when people bang on about thing s that can`t be explained in conspiracy theories, there can often be something that no-one could have possibly thought could happen, actually does happen.

In this case, Planes can disintigrate at high speed collisions, and yes, the wall was being tested, but you don`t think that`s the only type of wall that can disintegrate a plane do you.
Those walls are actually what they use to protect Nuclear stations from such attacks.

Understand now?

Quote (SteMot @ Sep. 19 2006, 3:43 pm)

Quote (The Stalker @ Sep. 19 2006, 11:36 am) Quote (SteMot @ Sep. 19 2006, 12:20 pm) Yeah, I saw that Vid of the plane before, sometimes unexplainable things can be explained. If it's unexplainable then why was it expalined? =S ?? I don't quite understand. Wow... Read the comment beneath that video. It says something like I think they were testing the wall, not the plane   I meant that when people bang on about thing s that can`t be explained in conspiracy theories, there can often be something that no-one could have possibly thought could happen, actually does happen. In this case, Planes can disintigrate at high speed collisions, and yes, the wall was being tested, but you don`t think that`s the only type of wall that can disintegrate a plane do you. Those walls are actually what they use to protect Nuclear stations from such attacks. Understand now?

Sort of. But yeah I can see what you're getting at.

Oh. I'd have to say first wall I've see disintegrate a plane.  

1. Pentagone wall were not Nuclear station wall.
2. The plane that meet the Pentagone were not suppose to be as small as a figther. It was supposed to be slower, with a lot more mass.
3. Some peice just cannot "desappear"... Like the reactor fan, which is in titanium.

Quote (U.S.S. Speed @ Sep. 19 2006, 2:10 pm)

1. Pentagone wall were not Nuclear station wall. 2. The plane that meet the Pentagone were not suppose to be as small as a figther. It was supposed to be slower, with a lot more mass. 3. Some peice just cannot "desappear"... Like the reactor fan, which is in titanium.

1) You know that the Pentagon doesn`t have the same properties?

2)Your point is what? That video shown a fighter, but I think the objective is for the same effect whatever the plane, otherwise, what would be the point of using them on power stations?

3)You can`t tell what was actually found inside the Pentagon from a few pictures.

There was one clean hole in the side of the Pentagon.  You mean to tell me that a jetliner hit it, and was entirely vaporized before the engines could even slightly scratch the wall surrounding the hole?

There's definately something weird there.  I'm not saying I believe the theories, but I do believe that 1. anything's possible and 2. there are some anomolies I would love to have explained.

I'm shocked!  Cobalt disproving part of the Big Conspiracy?!