No, my question is:
In ENT, they explained why they went from bump to no bump to bump.  What was the explination.

They did?

Well if it involved S4, give a spoiler warning.  Haven't seen it yet.

************Spolier**************


It had something to do with Klingons augmented with Augment Human DNA. They were called Klingon Augments. Human Augments were genetically engineered humans like Kahn. The altered Klingons basically were supposed to be super Klingons, but it didn't work out that way. When the Klingons were infused with the augment DNA their forehead ridges became less pronounced and they looked like the TOS Klingons.

I loved the 35th Anniversary DS9 episode where Sisko and crew went back to the original Enterprise.  When the Chief saw TOS era Klingons he asked Worf what that was all about and Worf just said, "We do not speak of it!"     Good stuff.

very good episode. One of my favorites.

Quote (Agent007 @ Feb. 03 2006, 3:57 pm)

What's TMP?  I'm not a trekkie! What are you talking about, Dave?  The Klingons?  Basically, on TOS, they were just guys w/ goatees.  Then in TNG they were the Klingons everyone knows now w/ the forehead bumps and all the makeup/SFX.  On Enterprise, set before TOS, they used the TNG-type Klingons.  So the history of Klingons is 'bumps - no bumps - bumps.' And yeah, I see the irony in this post.  I'm still not a trekkie.

Actually, the first Klingon seen with the brow ridges was in TMP [= The Motion Picture]. Played by none other than Mark Leonard.



And I think you have latent trekkie tendencies.

It's ok Agent, it's called "denial".  

Ah, makes sense now.  thanks.