SoF2 really bummed out with this review, and I agree with PCQ, 70% seems right, why so low you ask? because of how bad the AI is,see through trees and grass. It really pissed off PCG... me too. If only raven realized this before the patch  

I don't see why that's such an important reason to bash the game and totally bring down the score. I mean, there's only like 3 levels out of 60 that have grass and there are still trees to find cover. Sure, because you can't hide Colombia is one of the hardest missions in the game but someone with skills is still able to finish it successfully! Besides that the multiplayer is fun and there people won't be able to see you in the grass, well if you are crouching the right way.

Do you actually have the game yet, Toxic? I remember you mentioning a while back you hadn't managed to pick up a copy yet.

who gives a flying f c u * abt the review.. this has been done bfr and now after 3  months u are telling me we have another bad review.. wow i am amazed now..

/sarcasm for all the moronic trolls who actually think i meant that..

1. The problems could of been avoided.
2. I'm borrowing the guy nextdoor's copy tell I get enough cash, I just ordered wc3.
3. madcow the game rules, you just suck.

lower then 70%?!?! ehhe this game isnt bad, its a good game with great multiplayer i would have to agree more with the 93% review i read on it  

I played the single player missions for about 10 minutes then it's been multiplayer all the way since. If I am correct, they didn't even mention the Multiplayer aspect of the game. But I never relied on review scores anyway because my preferences are so way off base.

The game in MP rocks.

I cannot comment on SP

You have to remember they are just some persons opinion.  For an example of how far off they can be, PC Gamer doesn't even mention Quake I when they talk about the birth of online fps shooters, and they think of TFC when they mention team fortress.... duh........