That's the last time I read that piece of junk site. How one could possibly rank SOF2 lower than MOH:AA is beyond me. I think the reviewers smoke serious drugs or are just plain @#%@#@ stupid.

I fail to see what MOH:AA introduces into the gendre of games. What? TDM? DM? Objective? MOH:AA is the biggest lag fest of any multiplayer game, has horrid support and the graphics are nothing to write home about. On top of that they made a million promises with MOH:AA that they "the developers" said would be in the game only to find out they were coming in the Team Assault addon, which is a cheap ass ploy to make people spend more money.

I see SOF2 adding a lot more features and much better interface as well as many other things I mentioned in another thread.

Well Gamespot is removed from my bookmarks. I can't stand @#$^%@#^@ biased review sites.      

Obviously the guys at raven just didnt pay gamespot enough.
We all know how deep EA's pockets go.  

i've never liked gamespots reviews.

lol nor me, and like many, even to this day, i cannot see how mohaa got so many good reviews, it might even have been due to backhanders, who knows.

I was pissed as #### when I bought MOHAA.  It's probably the worst FPS game I've ever played.  I played an hour of the SP, and another hour of the MP.  The graphics were poo-poo, running was like trudging throw quicksand (without the sinking part), and you never had ANY idea where your bullets were gonna go... oh yeah, and no blood (unless you installed an add-on).

If anyone wants it, you pay shipping.  Otherwise it's yours.

Well, I deleted them completely. Like I even searched my disks for any thing remotely similar to GamesPOT and killed it. That just really irritates me. The guy even states it himself, he pressed the abort key for the missions and then says that there is really no story or plot? Like is this guy for real? I just finished summing through his other reviews and it looks like Gamespot just hires cheap ass writers. This guy rated other games as 9+/10 and the games went NOWHERE. So that tells you just how good this guy is in knowledge of games and or the public.

I'm sorry but SOF2 introduces a lot more than MOH even came close to. Just a biased an unfair review.

My rating is a realistic 9.0 out of 10. I would have given it a 10 out of 10 if it had Co-op. Aside from that, this game rocks the foundation of any other shooter, and it ain't even close.

I imagine the Gamespot reviewers were smoking the same crack when they gave Max Lame a 92%. MOHAA & Max Payne have to be the most overrated, overhyped, PC games in history.

And then there's PC Lamer who gave both MP and MOHAA 95%. I cancelled my subscription after the Max Payne review.

I can't explain it. Maybe these reviewers are getting payed off by the publishers.

I am glad I finally found some people with some sense. I got rid of all gamespot relatied material a few months back. Can you believe they want you to pay for there stupid high speed downloads(when they should be FREE) besides I have cable modem wtf do I need there high speed BS for. Also I used to read there reviews and go... HUH! How did they come up with that. I did not and will not buy that MOH piece of crap. I am enjoying SF2 very much(in hong kong right now). OH by the way Max Payne kick ass too! You guys should try Dungeon siege as well, it has awsome graphics.

Ya, Max Lame was ok... but I would have never given it that kind of review as GamePuke did. All I know is that SOF2 is a way better game in all respects to MOH and Gamespot clearly doesn't have a handle on a proper review. I am thoroughly enjoying the single player game and having no problem following the story at any point. And to top it off, I am in no way going to finish SOF2 in 6 hours like I did MOH.

I don't know, I would think they are paid off for these reviews. Kudos to Raven for not giving them any money!!

Now, does anyone have a good site for game reviews... I need more!! thanks!!

Oh and I am playing Dungeon Seige. It's a simple game but it is strangely addictive. I play it nightly...