| Author |
Topic: Which Weapon Do U Use Most Often In Sof2? |
| ketamininja~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 902 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| Richard Ramirez~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 2026 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| Sheriff~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 6 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
Category: SoFII General Posted: Saturday, Jul. 12, 2003 11:07 pm |
 |
| Quote (Merlin45 @ June 13 2003, 8:31 am) | I doubt it is shorter than the MP5SD3, maybe the SD2 but the SD3 has a collapsible stock. Edit- oh yeah and the sight isn't very good and the backup iron sights suck, also the trigger is, by virtue of the bulpup design, substandard. Also due to the fact it is a bulpup I would never take it into CQB. In CQB you switch shoulders a lot, If you did that with the aug you would end up with a hole in your cheek and a mouth ful of hot lead when you switched shoulders. Also the exposed barrel is dangerous after firing. The aug is one of the best Bulpups, but that isn't saying much. (good in the open field though) |
Have you ever fired one. Now, the sight is not a sniper sight, but no one ever required it to be, the thing about it is that that little ring in the middle has the diameter of the 90 percentile male at 300m magnified 1.5x, in other words, put the ring over the target, and nail him. I've done it, it works. WRT CQB, depends on technique and user, I wouldn't change shoulders. WRT the exposed barrel, not if one is disciplined and trained, most firing stances don't involve the hand coming very close to the barrel, the worst I've experienced is a little discomfort after holding the weapon on the junction between the barrel and the receiver for firing 56 rounds in minutes. After 10 minutes (the time between clearing the weapon after the range serial and stripping the weapon to clean), the barrel was cold.
The trigger is like every other plastic component of the weapon, it can survive more impact damage than the metal (during one test, and AUG was run over 10 times by a Landrover, then a 3 tonne truck, then 6, and during the 10 tonne series, the sight bracket cracked, but the weapon was still usable. |
 |
|
|
| Merlin45~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 1639 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| Carben~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 232 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| turgon~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 1488 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| tjh566~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 935 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
| Fhylliarid~rb |
General Member Since: Dec 23, 2006 Posts: 112 Last: Dec 23, 2006 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
Category: SoFII General Posted: Thursday, Jul. 17, 2003 10:33 pm |
 |
AK all the way. It is a very stable gun: less accurate than the m4, but had less recoil and does more damage. Secondary gun would be shotty, ofcourse (as everybody else is using). Sometimes, I use the MP5as primary weapon. It does less damage than the ak, but is way more accurate, has very little recoil and a nice rate of fire. If you can keep hitting an opponent, he/she won't even have a chance of pulling the trigger! I only use this gun on RMG or otherwise "long distance" maps. Uzi is nice as a sec weapon. The problem is you have to keep hitting an opponent to get a chance. In close quarters, this is a problem, for the enemy can easily jump out of your gun spray (d@mn, my english sux). I never use the grease gun as sec gun, although it does most damage per bullet (which means a relatively good secondary gun for long range).
Time to sleep. :-) |
 |
|
|
|
|
mp_TempleCall of Duty: Mods: Multiplayer (624.12Kb)
|