Author |
Topic: ModsonWiki spammed again |
sam_fisher3000 |
|
General Member Since: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 816 Last: Jul 16, 2016 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
foyleman |
|
Preferred PLUS Member Since: Nov 7, 2001 Posts: 95765 Last: Apr 9, 2024 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sam_fisher3000 |
|
General Member Since: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 816 Last: Jul 16, 2016 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
Tally |
General Member Since: Apr 21, 2005 Posts: 819 Last: Oct 26, 2012 [view latest posts] |
|
|
Category: MODSonline Posted: Friday, Sep. 7, 2012 07:20 pm |
|
foyleman writes...Quote: I did add more security, but they found another way around.
At this point, the only way to make it secure is to replace the entire wiki backend (it's old) and doing so will cause us to have to rebuild everything. I know this because last time I tried everything was screwed. It's because GoDaddy (the host) has too many limitations on us. We can't afford better hosting anymore.
I think we are going to discard the wiki at this point. It is too difficult to maintain.
What about restricting who can edit the wiki? Surely that would work. Limit it to a select number of "trusted" editors. I know the idea of a wiki is to allow free access to add stuff at our own discretion, but if the alternative is to dump the wiki, I'm sure everyone will agree that trusted editors would be preferable.
I would hate to see the wiki go. As much or as small as it is, it contains a lot of historically valuable items. I always hate to see people's hard work from the past go to waste. We already lost a very useful resource when we lost IWNation.com, what with all the wealth of historical information it contained. I would hate to see the modsonWiki go the same way. |
|
|
|
sam_fisher3000 |
|
General Member Since: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 816 Last: Jul 16, 2016 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
Tally |
General Member Since: Apr 21, 2005 Posts: 819 Last: Oct 26, 2012 [view latest posts] |
|
|
Category: MODSonline Posted: Friday, Sep. 7, 2012 07:39 pm |
|
sam_fisher3000 writes...Quote: From what I have seen in the recent changes page, it showed some IP addresses. So those are the "untrusted" ones. These are the dirty IP addresses and should be blacklisted. Assuming all these spams come from these IPs, it may be possible to just block those IPs. If these people decide to use another computer to spam again, they really have a lot of time on their hands. Though I doubt not. This is another alternative suggestion supposedly the wiki allows blocking IP addresses.
Some people.
Blocking IP addresses of zombie spam bots is futile. There are literally millions of PCs being used to run spam bots, and it is obviously untenable to block all those IP addresses. |
|
|
|
sam_fisher3000 |
|
General Member Since: Apr 18, 2007 Posts: 816 Last: Jul 16, 2016 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
zeroy |
|
General Member Since: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 1060 Last: Mar 12, 2014 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
Mystic |
|
General Member Since: Apr 10, 2004 Posts: 6147 Last: Apr 15, 2018 [view latest posts] |
|
|
|
|
|
zeroy |
|
General Member Since: Nov 26, 2007 Posts: 1060 Last: Mar 12, 2014 [view latest posts] |
|
|
Category: MODSonline Posted: Monday, Sep. 10, 2012 02:31 pm |
|
Mystic writes...Quote: Just noticed the registration has no protection at all, even a simple text captcha helps, but it's a right pain to maintain and in all honesty i don't think it's even worth it. Sure some people use it, but not enough to justify the amount of work it will take to repair.
Some ModsOnWiki articles are on Modsrepository.com .. I could certainly have a look and add the missing one.
http://wiki.modsrepository.com/index.php/Special:Search?search=modsonline&go=Go
|
|
|
|