After weeks of being the main topic of websites and magazines, the People versus Rockstar Games case has come to an end when the ESRB gave the verdict, after analyzing the game’s source code, both the PC and the console (Xbox and PS2) versions.

You can read the rest of this article Here

So what's this mean? This is an aweful article. It goes through all this talk about how Rockstar is at fault, but it doesn't:

- say anything about the penalty if there even is one
- point out that Rockstar is already remaking the game and the newer, cleaner version should be available in stores this week.

The teenagers are buying games out the wazoo that blast and pulverize their fellow man. The same types of games that the Military is using to train combat soldiers. But heaven forbid if you have a little bot sex in a game.
Guess what's next on the agenda? OH, games like COD, SOF2 etc. in the future will be rated adults only because all the violence, that is unless they outright ban them. Boys, I beleive the gaming industry will be in trouble.

it already is rEdrUmMDK...

Sorry but I cant understand the big deal about it !
So let me get this right, if you can be bothered to search the internet for some type of code, youll be able to watch a few computer generated tits in a game ! WOW !

Any kid who has access to the internet and half the brains needed to type in the words "FREE SEX" in google will see a lot more than some pixelated nipples !

OK, so the porn game is hidden from normal play, I suppose that is a little under hand and very suspisious. But get real guys who really wants to get off over some computer generated porn scenes ???????

Now... anyone know the code !! LOL

With all the P2P video's out there, this is just a novelty example of children getting access to adult material anyway...

Main differance between M and AO is a ONE year gap between sexual content and nudity...

I'm sorry but, the average age's for graduating highschool is 17, and your telling me that by the time your holding your diploma, you still haven't seen any nudity, YEA RIGHT...

Has any one seen the clip from the hot coffee mod? T'is not as graphic as beating up the cops in the game. First off the guy has his pants on, and the girls body skin doesn't have a good resolution compared to other graphics in the game.

Anyway, can anyone with an old copy of GTA:SA trade it in for the new and clean one?

edited on Aug. 22, 2005 04:15 pm by [FR]Sparks

Are you asking to make a trade or are you asking if it can be traded in? I don't remember hearing about the ability to trade it in to the store, but there are patches available that can be installed to prevent access to the hot coffee mod.

So... they are complaining about a sexual game on GTA? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the game is pretty much all about stealing cars, killing people (for either missions or fun) and the US Government are worried about seeing a naked woman and letting the players interact with her?

So, are they saying sex is wrong? If so, we can kiss the human race good-bye as reproduction is out of the question. If they are moaning about a bit of sex, does that mean stealing cars and killing members of the public and police officers "for a laugh" is now acceptable? If so, does anyone know anyone with a Dodge Viper or a Hummer H1?

I dont get it, GTA:SA is an 18 rated game so whats worng with a bit of nudity!! What's the sexual age limit in america, here in Britian its 16 but Britian is a verry sexual contry and has the higest underage sex percent in the world so a little bit of virtual nudeity is nothink just as average as the none modded version of GTA:SA.